How to interprete two way anova result [closed]

#1
I was doing a two way anova where factor a, the managers, have three levels, and factor b, training or no training received (i.e two levels). When I did the f statistic for the interaction between the factors I got the answer that there is no interaction between the factors. How do you interpret the fact that there is no interaction between the managers and training or no training received? I got stumped here. Because I know that receiving or not receiving training can impact the effectiveness of a manager.
thanks