Interpretation of two way ANOVA in PAST

#1
1579462912641.png
Based on the image attached above: If the p value is less than 0.05, does this mean the results show a significant influence of ecotype/salt conc. on rosette width. Or does it mean the null hypothesis can be accepted (with 95% certainly) if the p value is below 0.05?
It would also be appreciated if someone could tell me if my conclusion at the bottom of the image is correct.
I am using PAlaeontological STatistics (PAST).
Thanks in advance
 

Karabiner

TS Contributor
#2
If p < 0.05, then coventionally the Null hypothesis is rejected.

It is not the salt+eco combination which is'nt statistically significant, but the salt*eco interaction.

With kind regards

Karabiner