Hi all,
when we read descriptions of several post-hoc tests, we get actually lost, because everyone has its advantage/disadvantage. And sometimes you reach to a point where you can't decide which one is better to use. Even if you use all the candidate post-hoc tests that most likely fit your situation, you might get different significance results.
If we read researches done on them, we usually come across some terminologies that describe them, namely:
Liberal test, Conservative test, a test with tight/loose control over alpha, a test with low/high power.
Actually I can know what high/low power is.
but what is the difference between having a conservative test and a test with tight control over alpha. Aren't they same?
when we read descriptions of several post-hoc tests, we get actually lost, because everyone has its advantage/disadvantage. And sometimes you reach to a point where you can't decide which one is better to use. Even if you use all the candidate post-hoc tests that most likely fit your situation, you might get different significance results.
If we read researches done on them, we usually come across some terminologies that describe them, namely:
Liberal test, Conservative test, a test with tight/loose control over alpha, a test with low/high power.
Actually I can know what high/low power is.
but what is the difference between having a conservative test and a test with tight control over alpha. Aren't they same?