Hi all,
I have a question:
If I have five groups, overall significant one-way Anova, and I want to examine all pairwise tests, considering both Type I familywise and Type II error rates, which test is the better to conduct, tukey or fisher-hayter?
This test is not planned, and it is post-hoc, and alpha is o.o5
If anyone can help, really appreciate it. thanks
I have a question:
If I have five groups, overall significant one-way Anova, and I want to examine all pairwise tests, considering both Type I familywise and Type II error rates, which test is the better to conduct, tukey or fisher-hayter?
This test is not planned, and it is post-hoc, and alpha is o.o5
If anyone can help, really appreciate it. thanks