Search results

im getting cohen' kappa vibes...

Welcome to the forum!

you could use the pearson correlation, invented by the great eugenicist, and sometimes statistician karl pearson.

sorry, can you change the question then so they align better. thanks.

sorry I meant no 'r' in medians sorry for the miscomunication.

r squared is best when it is close to 1. Remember "close to one, time for fun; close to zero, Robert deniro"

r doesn't have medians.

try a box plot.

thanks katxt ill check it out.

Ill take a dump upon a stump ill take a leak beside a creek one thing i won't do anywhere is run a yates-corrected chi-square.

j = i + 1

Essay Idea: "Biostatistics: Eugenic's gift to modern science".

no problem-o

oh fine. have it your way. So we'll add everyone born before 1972 to the stats bastards list, on suspicion of racist associations or existing in a general millieu of racism. So far the list: Stats Basterds: 1) The alleged peter-peeper at Tufts. 2) Statisticians born before 1972 3) Spunky...

well i mean eugenics is bad, but the fact that they studied eugenics is just a product of their times.

eugenics is not really that bad. they studied eugenics for the same reason I study covid, research funding. Statisticians will do anything for a little research funding, nothing has changed in that respect. RA fisher is disagreeable, but thats also par for the course. Im thinking more like...

i was listening to podcast 'behind the bastards' got to thinking if there are any statisticians who were known bastards but contributed alot to stats theory. I mean reeeeeeeeeeeeal bastards, though, not just through modern eyes.

same way, but exclude one of the categories: 2______3545.666______0.29__________________novel male 2______8570.965______0.71__________________previous partner the estimate for the excluded category is jest 1 - the other one, ain't it. see its technically a negative correlation between these...

i think the issue is that you can't have a linear dependance amongst the three outcomes, in this case proportion of time. same as a chi-square only has p-1 degrees of freedom.

has the ring of 'catch effort' estimation. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1572312706000189#:~:text=In%20particular%2C%20in%20the%20catch,fixed%20number%20of%20repeated%20surveys. except the 'catch' is observing the bird and effort is time spent observing. or that has...