Hello all,
I am prepping for Graduate school next Spring... and my eyes are focused on getting a PhD in Marketing (I don't know if the focus will be behavioral or quantitiative) I realize I have some time ahead of me to worry, but I like being as prepared as possible which is why I'd like to pose some questions for the members here.
First Question:
It seems that because of technology and programs like SPSS, many researchers can employ pretty advanced analysis without really understanding what is going on behind the scenes. I would imagine that many social scientists don't have an exhaustive math background... so what is more important- focusing on my discipline or learning statistics inside and out?
Second Question:
What kind of a general math background do you think will help someone succeed in a PhD in Marketing program (candidates usually need to take statistics up to at least multivariate - i;ve seen some places require linear algebra, bayesian models... stuff i know nothing about basically.) All I have ever taken was an applied calc class. I loved it, but it was not "proof based" I honestly never even had any exposure to 'proofs' so I don't know what I am missing or how to compensate for my math immaturity.
I do know that I thought it was cool when I learned that one SD away from the mean = the inflection point of curve = point where second derivative changes sign. How important are these kinds of connections? I would imagine there are hundreds of facts like this... and it worries me that I do not know them!
I am prepping for Graduate school next Spring... and my eyes are focused on getting a PhD in Marketing (I don't know if the focus will be behavioral or quantitiative) I realize I have some time ahead of me to worry, but I like being as prepared as possible which is why I'd like to pose some questions for the members here.
First Question:
It seems that because of technology and programs like SPSS, many researchers can employ pretty advanced analysis without really understanding what is going on behind the scenes. I would imagine that many social scientists don't have an exhaustive math background... so what is more important- focusing on my discipline or learning statistics inside and out?
Second Question:
What kind of a general math background do you think will help someone succeed in a PhD in Marketing program (candidates usually need to take statistics up to at least multivariate - i;ve seen some places require linear algebra, bayesian models... stuff i know nothing about basically.) All I have ever taken was an applied calc class. I loved it, but it was not "proof based" I honestly never even had any exposure to 'proofs' so I don't know what I am missing or how to compensate for my math immaturity.
I do know that I thought it was cool when I learned that one SD away from the mean = the inflection point of curve = point where second derivative changes sign. How important are these kinds of connections? I would imagine there are hundreds of facts like this... and it worries me that I do not know them!