Shortened because it would push onto another line and go onto a second page. The Forbes lady said no more than half of your bullets should run onto two lines. Keep them short.
I don't think the PhD vs Ph.D. makes a big difference to an employer, but I think I can change the research methods clause to something like "Psychology Research Paper." That should fit fine.
As for computer languages, there's no room, and I might throw it into the cover letter to emphasize it to an employer that wants to know those details. Instead, specific languages and topics or whatever are included on the bullets where experienced with them was gained. This came from the Forbes example, and I liked it. There's a lot of redundancy: e.g., R), but that'll also layer on the significance of that which gets repeated--I use it a lot!
If I included languages on the resume, I'd want to separate out those that I'm proficient in vs those that I'm merely familiar with. The Forbes person made a point that you don't want to list a language unless you're proficient with it unless you emphasize the difference in quality. Otherwise, if you say you can do java, then you better be able to whip out a Java example during an interview if they asked. I might be able to wing it, but I am by far not that proficient in all the **** I know! lol