I still kind of wish we gave the StatisticsPedia site a little more love.
I agree dason. I think it has great potential. Unfortunately, I haven't played with it much. When I have It's been as a consumer and not a provider of info, (great C+ from R article by the way. Thanks for taking the time to write it. I'm not there yet with programming but someday...). I would like to get the idea of providing people with articl
e and book resources for specific stats analysis methods/models, per bugman’s suggestion.
Right now I have lots of questions about this idea:
How do I start something like this in statspedia?
Do I have the ability to post something like that there?
Is post even the right word?
How would it get set up?
Statisticspedia seems a bit more authoritative than a forum, should the content and posts be monitored to ensure quality articles are suggested?
I guess from my questions it’s obvious I haven’t read any of the guide for statisticspedia like I have the guidelines for forum posting and FAQ.
Anyway that was my thought on the subject of Statisticspedia. I think it’s a great idea but have only noticed Dason’s article (haven’t checked in a while though). I myself am not competent enough about statistics to write an article like that. I guess I could write (for instance a logistic regression how to) but it would be missing a great deal of the mathematics that I am missing. If I were to post something I’d feel more confident having a more knowledgeable person (aka a contributor or moderator) look it over first.
I’d love to see more articles that we could point people to in the forums but that takes time.
Anyway if you made it this far in my post good job for sticking with incoherent mumble.
