to me, it just seems that some of the health-economics things are too open to seeing it the way you want to. The score keeping just seems open to manipulation. Its hard enough to agree on basic things like 'did they die of the disease y/n', and the data is all a mish-mash of various sources and methods with no real control or standardization.
**
BINGO ** The nuance between dying
with, and dying
from, COVID-19 makes all the difference in clouding the official check-marked fatality data …
right, Dr Birx? (early April press conference, where she outlines the difference between US official policy and that of other countries). Also back in April, the
follow-the-money incentive for
hospital administrators to classify patients as COVID-19 sufferers –
confirmed or not, pre-existing conditions or none -- was revealed by a physician-politician, a claim that survived debunking.
Courtesy of the CDC, a look at the concrete raw macro-data of
all US deaths shows the diminishing effect of COVID-19 on overall weekly fatalities:
From that
Big Picture study, it certainly appears that
the impact/threat of COVID-19 is dissipating ... but you wouldn’t know that from what’s being squawked about by
health officials,
politicians and the
media. It's almost as if these pillars-of-the-community have an agenda.
UPDATE (9/15):
Is there something fishy going on at the CDC..? (beyond just counting all COVID deaths with the disease as from the disease)
Their
ongoing chart on US weekly deaths (below) is predicting an unprecedented low number of deaths in our near future … a cynic could suggest that this might allow the CDC to boost the all-important “
observed count above threshold” for excess deaths, heaven knows why.

The
fishyness at the CDC continues unabated, as they massage both the projected and observed US weekly death counts. That odd low weekly projection noted above has since been rectified upward, as well as
past weeks' projections being somewhat adjusted --
what? -- as well as the observed death counts ... all after the fact, which doesn't sound kosher (10/1).
I guess if you torture data enough, it will say what you want ... but
what's the intended CDC message here?
--------[ WAIT ... THERE'S MORE!!! ]-------
Dr. Rebel Cole -- a business-analyst professor from Florida, a COVID-19 epicenter --
notes the faulty recording/reporting on the incidence rate of infection and fatality (7/20). His team at Florida Atlantic University created a ‘
COVID tracker’ that more accurately accounts for these statistics in the state. In a TV interview (7/24),
Dr. Cole laments that government data is irretrievably screwed skewed by:
1) Dr Birx’s April mandate that a death with COVID must be counted as a death from COVID,
2) many testing facilities reporting only positive tests, not their negative tests, and
3) deaths and new cases tending to be reported in clumps, not on the day they occurred.
In the first link above, Dr Cole points out that the original strain of the COVID-19 virus, known as ‘D614’, mutated into a new strain known as ‘
G614’. Researchers have determined that
the new strain is about 10 times as infectious as the original virus, but is much less lethal. It is G614 that is prevalent across the Sun Belt, where positive cases have soared.
--------[ WAIT ... THERE'S MORE!!! ]-------
In the interest of not having to stress over strains, a
University of Bologna research team finds that “the virus causing the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, presents at least six strains. Despite its mutations
, the virus shows little variability, and this is good news for the researchers working on a viable vaccine” (8/4). The
Unibo team leader notes that
- "The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is presumably already optimized to affect human beings, and this explains its low evolutionary change" (the common flu generally has at least twice as many strains), and he adds that
- "Strain G and its related strains ... are by far the most widespread, representing 74% of all gene sequences we analysed" (48,635 coronavirus genomes which were isolated by researchers in labs all over the world).
Then again --
FRANKENBUG? -- a very credible Italian expert in biotechnology and nanotechnology released
a book back in April that maintained that the COVID-19 virus was developed in a Wuhan lab (4/8), and noted that the Chinese program had early assistance from the French and Americans, including possible support work from grants from Dr Fauci’s
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease . Now the
esperto Italiano concludes that
this ‘chimera’ – with man-altered DNA -- will be resistant to vaccines across the various virus strains (8/10,
Conspiracy alert). Of course, the Chinese seem to have misplaced the original
matrix or source samples of their viral handiwork ... which would have been really really helpful in developing vaccine(s)...